Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 2 (250T20)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250T20)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia Tegra 2 (250T20) vs the Intel Core i3 2350M.

Front view of Intel Core i3 2350M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2350M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 333 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 2 (250T20) vs Core i3 2350M

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 2 (250T20)  vs
Core i3 2350M 
Clock speed 1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label ULP GeForce HD 3000
GPU clock speed 333 MHz 650 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel

details

Tegra 2 (250T20)  vs
Core i3 2350M 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 40 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250T20)
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2350M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus