Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 72.31W 89x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 89x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 89x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 5400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 5400+

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 2.8x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 2 (250 AP20H) vs Athlon X2 5400+

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)  vs
Athlon X2 5400+ 
Clock speed 1 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ULP GeForce N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A

details

Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)  vs
Athlon X2 5400+ 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 90 nm

power consumption

TDP 1W 89W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 72.31W
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 5400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus