Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H) vs AMD Athlon X2 5400+ |
Released January, 2010
Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)
- 1 GHz
- Dual core
-front.jpg)
Reasons to buy the Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)
 | Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon X2 5400+
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon X2 5400+
| | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
-front.jpg)
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower typical power consumption | 0.81W | vs | 72.31W | 89x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | 89x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | 89x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | More than 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | ARM | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
-front.jpg)
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 2 (250 AP20H) vs Athlon X2 5400+
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Tegra 2 (250 AP20H) | vs | Athlon X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | ULP GeForce | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | N/A | |
details | Tegra 2 (250 AP20H) | vs | Athlon X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ARM | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 40 nm | 90 nm | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 1W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 0.81W | 72.31W | |
 Nvidia Tegra 2 (250 AP20H)  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon X2 5400+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| E6600 vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 7750 vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | ||
| 2120 vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 4800+ vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 5000+ vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 6000+ vs 5400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs 5400+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
