Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of NVIDIA Tegra 4i

Reasons to consider the
NVIDIA Tegra 4i

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of Intel Core i7 2630QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2630QM

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.64 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Tegra 4i  vs Core i7 2630QM 

clock speed

Tegra 4i
2.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Tegra 4i
1.8 GHz
Core i7 2630QM
2.64 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Tegra 4i
1.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 4i  vs
Core i7 2630QM 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.64 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.64 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 36.56W

details

Tegra 4i  vs
Core i7 2630QM 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 32 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
NVIDIA Tegra 4i
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 2630QM
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus