Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of MediaTek MT6589

Reasons to consider the
MediaTek MT6589

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.21 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel x3-C3230RK

Reasons to consider the
Intel x3-C3230RK

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Features Key features of the MT6589  vs x3-C3230RK 

clock speed

MT6589
1.2 GHz
x3-C3230RK
1.1 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

MT6589
1.21 GHz
x3-C3230RK
1.1 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

MT6589
1.2 GHz
x3-C3230RK
1.1 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

MT6589  vs
x3-C3230RK 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.21 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.21 GHz 1.1 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A

details

MT6589  vs
x3-C3230RK 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR Series5XT SGX544 Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
MediaTek MT6589
Report a correction
Intel x3-C3230RK
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus