Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of MediaTek MT6589

Reasons to consider the
MediaTek MT6589

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Atom Z2610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2610

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the MT6589  vs Atom Z2610 

clock speed

MT6589
1.2 GHz
Atom Z2610
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

MT6589
1 MB
Atom Z2610
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

MT6589
1.21 GHz
Atom Z2610
1.3 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

MT6589
1.2 GHz
Atom Z2610
1.3 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

MT6589  vs
Atom Z2610 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.21 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.21 GHz 1.3 GHz

details

MT6589  vs
Atom Z2610 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
MediaTek MT6589
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2610
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus