MediaTek MT6589 vs Intel Atom Z2580 |
Expected September, 2013
MediaTek MT6589
- 1.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the MediaTek MT6589
 | Newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | More cores 4 |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2013
Intel Atom Z2580
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom Z2580
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.78 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | vs | 0.93 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.78 GHz | vs | 1.21 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of MT6589 vs Atom Z2580
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | MT6589 | vs | Atom Z2580 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.21 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | 0.93 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.21 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A | |
details | MT6589 | vs | Atom Z2580 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ARM | x86 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 32 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | PowerVR Series5XT SGX544 | PowerVR SGX 544MP2 | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
 MediaTek MT6589  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z2580 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $22 | ||
| Z2580 vs 800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $22 | ||
| Z2580 vs 400 (Dual) | ||
 | VS | |
| MT6589 vs 400 (Dual) | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT6589 vs S4 Pro (APQ8064) | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| MT6589 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT6589 vs N4200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| MT6589 vs N2840 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
