0 Comments
| MediaTek MT6589 vs Intel Atom Z2580 |
Expected September, 2013
MediaTek MT6589
- 1.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the MediaTek MT6589
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 28 nm | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2013
Intel Atom Z2580
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom Z2580
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.78 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | vs | 0.93 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.78 GHz | vs | 1.21 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of MT6589 vs Atom Z2580
GeekBench
MT6589
1,287
Atom Z2580
1,231
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | MT6589 | vs | Atom Z2580 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.21 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.2 GHz | 0.93 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.21 GHz | 1.78 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A |
details | MT6589 | vs | Atom Z2580 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | ARM | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 28 nm | 32 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | PowerVR Series5XT SGX544 | PowerVR SGX 544MP2 | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
MediaTek MT6589 ![]() | Intel Atom Z2580 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$22 | ||
Z2580 vs 800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$22 | ||
Z2580 vs 400 (Dual) | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$22 | ||
Z2580 vs 600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MT6589 vs 400 (Dual) | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MT6589 vs S4 Pro (APQ8064) | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MT6589 vs 800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MT6589 vs Z2560 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||