Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

View of Marvel PXA918

Reasons to consider the
Marvel PXA918

Report a correction
Newer Aug, 2012 vs Jul, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E4500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E4500

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 0.62 GHz More than 3.5x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 4x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.52 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 4.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the PXA918  vs Core2 Duo E4500 

clock speed

PXA918
0.62 GHz
Core2 Duo E4500
2.2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Core2 Duo E4500
3.16 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Core2 Duo E4500
3.52 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

PXA918  vs
Core2 Duo E4500 
Clock speed 0.62 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.8 GHz 3.16 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.8 GHz 3.52 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.8 GHz 3.16 GHz

details

PXA918  vs
Core2 Duo E4500 
Architecture ARM x86-64

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
Marvel PXA918
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo E4500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus