Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

View of Marvel PXA918

Reasons to consider the
Marvel PXA918

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Marvel PXA918 vs the Intel Celeron N3150.

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.62 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Aug, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the PXA918  vs Celeron N3150 

clock speed

PXA918
0.62 GHz
Celeron N3150
1.6 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Celeron N3150
1.75 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Celeron N3150
1.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

PXA918  vs
Celeron N3150 
Clock speed 0.62 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.8 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.8 GHz 1.75 GHz

details

PXA918  vs
Celeron N3150 
Architecture ARM x86-64

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 4.88W
Marvel PXA918
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus