Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

View of Marvel PXA918

Reasons to consider the
Marvel PXA918

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Marvel PXA918 vs the Intel Celeron J1800.

Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 0.62 GHz More than 3.8x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.58 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Aug, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the PXA918  vs Celeron J1800 

clock speed

PXA918
0.62 GHz
Celeron J1800
2.41 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Celeron J1800
2.58 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

PXA918
0.8 GHz
Celeron J1800
2.58 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

PXA918  vs
Celeron J1800 
Clock speed 0.62 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.8 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.8 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.8 GHz 2.58 GHz

details

PXA918  vs
Celeron J1800 
Architecture ARM x86-64

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 8.13W
Marvel PXA918
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus