0 Comments
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs N4200 |
Released January, 2016
Intel x5-Z8350
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x5-Z8350
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.44 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.44 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the N4200
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 28.3 | ![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 5.24 mPixels/s |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.44 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 28.3 | vs | 22.5 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 5.24 mPixels/s | vs | 3.16 mPixels/s | More than 65% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.92 GHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 852 | vs | 311 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | vs | 1.71 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2016 | Release date 6 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of x5-Z8350 vs N4200
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x5-Z8350 | vs | N4200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1.92 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | x5-Z8350 | vs | N4200 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.71 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.71 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel x5-Z8350 ![]() | Intel N4200 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
x5-Z8350 vs N3010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | ||
N4200 vs 4405U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N4200 vs N3710 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$167 | $42 | |
E6550 vs G1610 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
T7400 vs T5600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
430 vs 3200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
5200U vs 5010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,083 | ||
E5-2689 vs 2687W v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
B980 vs 2328M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,846 | $350 | |
E5-2683 v3 vs 6700K | ||