Intel x5-Z8350 vs N4200 |
Released January, 2016
Intel x5-Z8350
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x5-Z8350
 | Higher clock speed 1.44 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.44 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the N4200
| | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 28.3 | | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 5.24 mPixels/s |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.44 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 28.3 | vs | 22.5 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 5.24 mPixels/s | vs | 3.16 mPixels/s | More than 65% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.92 GHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 852 | vs | 311 | Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | vs | 1.71 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2016 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of x5-Z8350 vs N4200
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x5-Z8350 | vs | N4200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1.92 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | x5-Z8350 | vs | N4200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.71 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.71 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel x5-Z8350  Report a correction |  Intel N4200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| N4200 vs 6100U | ||
| | VS |  |
| N4200 vs N3350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $21 | ||
| x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | ||
| x5-Z8350 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS | |
| x5-Z8350 vs N3350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| x5-Z8350 vs N3450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| x5-Z8350 vs 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $67 | $74 | |
| E2140 vs 925 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
