0 Comments
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3795 |
Released January, 2016
Intel x5-Z8350
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x5-Z8350
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 3.16 mPixels/s | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Newer Jan, 2016 |
VS
Released March, 2014
Intel Atom Z3795
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3795
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.39 GHz |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 23 | ![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 667 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 3.16 mPixels/s | vs | 0.98 mPixels/s | Around 3.2x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Mar, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.39 GHz | vs | 1.92 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 23 | vs | 22.5 | Almost the same | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 667 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | Around 35% better turbo clock speed | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 311 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | More than 55% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 516 | vs | 311 | More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.71 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3795
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
x5-Z8350
5.45 mHash/s
Atom Z3795
1.63 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
x5-Z8350
3.16 mPixels/s
Atom Z3795
0.98 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
x5-Z8350
47.35 fps
Atom Z3795
34.07 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
x5-Z8350
0.33 fps
Atom Z3795
0.11 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
x5-Z8350
3.44 fps
Atom Z3795
1.73 fps
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
x5-Z8350
22.5
Atom Z3795
23
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
x5-Z8350
1,149
Atom Z3795
1,768
PassMark (Single Core)
x5-Z8350
311
Atom Z3795
516
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x5-Z8350 | vs | Atom Z3795 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1.92 GHz | 2.39 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 1.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | x5-Z8350 | vs | Atom Z3795 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.71 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | 1.59 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.71 GHz | 2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 311 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 500 MHz | 667 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 17,066.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB |
Intel x5-Z8350 ![]() | Intel Atom Z3795 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
x5-Z8350 vs N3450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
x5-Z8350 vs N3350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
x5-Z8350 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
x5-Z8350 vs N4200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||