0 Comments
| Intel x3-C3265RK vs Core i5 6200U |
Released October, 2016
Intel x3-C3265RK
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x3-C3265RK
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Newer Oct, 2016 |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 6200U
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Many more number of displays supported 3 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 600 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | 2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Oct, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2015 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Many more number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 1 | Three times as many number of displays supported | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the x3-C3265RK vs Core i5 6200U
gpu clock speed
x3-C3265RK
600 MHz
Core i5 6200U
300 MHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
x3-C3265RK
1.1 GHz
Core i5 6200U
2.8 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
x3-C3265RK
1.1 GHz
Core i5 6200U
2.8 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x3-C3265RK | vs | Core i5 6200U |
---|---|---|---|
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Integrated | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
Number of displays supported | 1 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 600 MHz | 300 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR2 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | x3-C3265RK | vs | Core i5 6200U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 28 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel x3-C3265RK ![]() | Intel Core i5 6200U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $281 | |
6200U vs 5200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $393 | |
6200U vs 6500U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 6th Gen A10-8700P | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||