Intel x3-C3200RK vs Atom Z3560 |
Released January, 2015
Intel x3-C3200RK
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x3-C3200RK
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Newer Jan, 2015 |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom Z3560
- 1.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3560
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.19 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.83 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.19 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the x3-C3200RK vs Atom Z3560
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x3-C3200RK | vs | Atom Z3560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Integrated | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 1 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 600 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB | |
details | x3-C3200RK | vs | Atom Z3560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.19 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 2.19 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel x3-C3200RK  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z3560 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 600 vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| Z3580 vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| 800 vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| Z3745 vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| $22 | ||
| Z2580 vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | ||
| Z3735F vs Z3560 | ||
 | VS | |
| x3-C3405 vs Z3560 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
