Intel x3-3205RK vs Core2 Quad Q8400 |
Released October, 2016
Intel x3-3205RK
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel x3-3205RK
 | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Newer Oct, 2016 |
VS
Released April, 2009
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400
- 2.66 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q8400
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2016 | vs | Apr, 2009 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Report a correction
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | x3-3205RK | vs | Core2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 135.97W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | x3-3205RK | vs | Core2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Integrated | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 1 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 600 MHz | N/A | |
 Intel x3-3205RK  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $179 | |
| Q8400 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $200 | |
| Q8400 vs Q9400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $125 | |
| Q8400 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $150 | |
| Q8400 vs 2100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $200 | |
| Q8400 vs E8500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | $287 | |
| Q8400 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
