Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel x3-3205RK

Reasons to consider the
Intel x3-3205RK

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Apr, 2009 Release date over 7 years later
Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

x3-3205RK  vs
Core2 Quad Q8400 
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 135.97W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

x3-3205RK  vs
Core2 Quad Q8400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Integrated N/A
Number of displays supported 1 N/A
GPU clock speed 600 MHz N/A
Intel x3-3205RK
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus