0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X7560 vs X5650 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X7560
- 2.27 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X7560
![]() | Much more l3 cache 24 MB | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | ![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5650
- 2.66 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the X5650
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.06 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 7.89 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.44 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 24 MB | vs | 12 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.06 GHz | vs | 2.67 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 7.89 pt/W | vs | 0.47 pt/W | More than 16.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.44 pt/$ | vs | 0.02 pt/$ | Around 90.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.84 GHz | vs | 2.39 GHz | More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 105.63W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.64 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X7560 vs X5650
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X7560
2,615
Xeon X5650
22,313
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X7560
1,459.5
Xeon X5650
2,176
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X7560
96.75 MB/s
Xeon X5650
1,470,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X7560 | vs | X5650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3.06 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1567 | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.47 pt/W | 7.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 4 | 2 | |
Data rate | 102,400 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
details | Xeon X7560 | vs | X5650 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 8 | 2 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.27 GHz | 4.64 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR |
Intel Xeon X7560 ![]() | Intel Xeon X5650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $264 | |
X5650 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $279 | |
X5650 vs E5620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $565 | |
X5650 vs E5645 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,670 | |
X5650 vs X5690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $60 | |
X5650 vs 920 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||