CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X7460 vs L7455 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon L7455 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L7455  based on its cost to run and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X7460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X7460

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 12 MB Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 12 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 2 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.81 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 2 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Xeon L7455

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L7455

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 105.63W 2x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 113.88 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 31.32 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X7460 vs L7455

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X7460
1,420
Xeon L7455
19,744

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X7460
73.3 MB/s
Xeon L7455
108 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X7460  vs
L7455 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Hexa core Hexa core
Socket type
604

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Xeon X7460  vs
L7455 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 6
L2 cache 16 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 2.67 MB/core 2 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 1,900,000,000 1,900,000,000
Max CPUs 32 32
Clock multiplier 10 8
Voltage range 0.9 - 1.45V 0.9 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 64°C Unknown - 73°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.81 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.81 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 130W 65W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.26 pt/W 2.87 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 1,066 MHz
Intel Xeon X7460
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L7455
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus