Winner
Intel Core i5 6200U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 6200U based on its power consumption and value.
See full details Intel Xeon X7460 vs Core i5 6200U |
Released September, 2008
Intel Xeon X7460
- 2.66 GHz
- Hexa core
4.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X7460
 | Much more l2 cache 16 MB | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 |
| | Significantly more l3 cache 16 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2.67 MB/core |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
8.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 6200U
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X7460 vs 6200U among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 16 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 32x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 3 MB | More than 5.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 10.8x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 80% more l3 cache per core | |||
| More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 105.63W | 8.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | vs | 0.26 pt/W | More than 40x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,583 | vs | 842 | More than 3x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,551 | vs | 1,420 | Around 4x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 0.57 pt/$ | vs | 0.01 pt/$ | Around 46.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Sep, 2008 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 8.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 8.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X7460 vs Core i5 6200U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X7460 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.26 pt/W | 10.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 12.19W | |
details | Xeon X7460 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 6 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.81 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.81 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 300 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Xeon X7460  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 6200U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 6200U vs 5200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| 6200U vs 6500U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 6th Gen A10-8700P | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
