Winner
Intel Xeon X5670
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5670 based on its performance, single-core performance, cost to run and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon X6550 vs X5670 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 18 MB | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | More l3 cache per core 2.25 MB/core |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz |
![]() | Much better PassMark score 8,013 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Xeon X5670CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 18 MB | vs | 12 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.25 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | Around 15% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 8,013 | vs | 2,977 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.29 GHz | vs | 2.07 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better performance per watt | 8.54 pt/W | vs | 0.73 pt/W | More than 11.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 69 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 105.63W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon X6550 | vs | X5670 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1567 | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.73 pt/W | 8.54 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 77.19W |
details | Xeon X6550 | vs | X5670 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 18 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.25 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69°C | Unknown - 81.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.07 GHz | 4.29 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 4.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.07 GHz | 4.29 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 4 | 2 | |
Data rate | 102,400 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon X6550 ![]() | Intel Xeon X5670 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $339 | |
X5670 vs X3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $777 | |
X5670 vs E5540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $240 | |
X5670 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,670 | |
X5670 vs X5690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $350 | |
X5670 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,417 | |
X5670 vs X5675 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $520 | |
X5670 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||