Winner
Intel Xeon X5650
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5650 based on its cost to run and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon X5690 vs X5650 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.46 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.73 GHz |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,504 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.47 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.44 pt/$ | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.73 GHz | vs | 3.06 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,504 | vs | 1,234 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.47 GHz | vs | 3.84 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.97 GHz | vs | 4.64 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Feb, 2011 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date 11 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.44 pt/$ | vs | 0.55 pt/$ | Around 2.8x better performance per dollar | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 78.5 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 105.63W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon X5690 | vs | X5650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.73 GHz | 3.06 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.01 pt/W | 7.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 77.19W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 31,999.98 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 294,912 MB |
details | Xeon X5690 | vs | X5650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 26 | 20 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.75 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 78.5°C | Unknown - 81.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 3 | 11 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.47 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.97 GHz | 4.64 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.47 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 51,200 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon X5690 ![]() | Intel Xeon X5650 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $264 | |
X5650 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,670 | $999 | |
X5690 vs W3690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,670 | $1,666 | |
X5690 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,670 | $1,059 | |
X5690 vs 990X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,670 | $1,417 | |
X5690 vs X5675 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||