0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5680 vs AMD Athlon II X2 275 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5680
- 3.33 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5680
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | More threads 12 |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon II X2 275
- 3.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 275
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 12 | vs | 2 | 10 more threads | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 105.63W | 2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.33 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon X5680 vs Athlon II X2 275
clock speed
Xeon X5680
3.33 GHz
Athlon II X2 275
3.5 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon X5680
2 MB
Athlon II X2 275
2 MB
TDP
Xeon X5680
130W
Athlon II X2 275
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5680 | vs | Athlon II X2 275 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon X5680 | vs | Athlon II X2 275 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon X5680 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 275 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,670 | $1,666 | |
X5690 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$594 | $1,666 | |
W3680 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $1,666 | |
X5675 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $1,666 | |
3770K vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,666 | |
X5670 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,666 | |
6700K vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,663 | $1,666 | |
X5687 vs X5680 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||