0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5677 vs X5675 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5677
- 3.46 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5677
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.46 GHz | ![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.73 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.78 GHz | ![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released February, 2011
Intel Xeon X5675
- 3.06 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the X5675
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 6 |
![]() | More threads 12 | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5677 vs X5675 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.46 GHz | vs | 3.06 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.73 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.78 GHz | vs | 4.29 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 105.63W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Feb, 2011 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date 11 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5677 vs X5675
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5677
18,912
Xeon X5675
25,323
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5677
2,580
Xeon X5675
2,418
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5677
1,770,000 MB/s
Xeon X5675
1,650,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5677
11,584
Xeon X5675
13,025
GeekBench
Xeon X5677
11,584
Xeon X5675
13,025
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X5677
6,984
Xeon X5675
8,527
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X5677
1,519
Xeon X5675
1,405
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5677 | vs | X5675 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 3.06 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.73 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.45 pt/W | 8.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 77.19W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 31,999.98 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 294,912 MB |
details | Xeon X5677 | vs | X5675 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 26 | 23 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.75 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 80.4°C | Unknown - 81.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.78 GHz | 4.29 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.47 GHz | 4.77 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.78 GHz | 4.29 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 51,200 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon X5677 ![]() | Intel Xeon X5675 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $1,670 | |
X5675 vs X5690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $1,443 | |
X5675 vs X5670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $1,666 | |
X5675 vs X5680 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $520 | |
X5675 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $240 | |
X5675 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $248 | |
X5675 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,417 | $60 | |
X5675 vs 920 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||