Winner
Intel Xeon X5675
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5675 based on its performance, single-core performance, cost to run and value.
See full details Intel Xeon X5675 vs X5365 |
Released February, 2011
Intel Xeon X5675
- 3.06 GHz
- Hexa core
5.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5675
 | Much better PassMark score 8,527 | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,405 |
| | More cores 6 | | Much better performance per watt 8.89 pt/W |
VS
Released August, 2007
Intel Xeon X5365
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the X5365
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5675 vs X5365 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 8,527 | vs | 3,491 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,405 | vs | 1,169 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 8.89 pt/W | vs | 1.22 pt/W | More than 7.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 63 °C | Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| More threads | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many threads | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.29 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 121.88W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.06 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Almost the same | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 131.4 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 36.13 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Newer | Feb, 2011 | vs | Aug, 2007 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 2 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5675 vs X5365
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5675 | vs | X5365 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1366 | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 150W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 36.13 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 131.4 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.89 pt/W | 1.22 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 121.88W | |
details | Xeon X5675 | vs | X5365 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 23 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 1 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.29 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.77 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.29 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 1,333 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon X5675  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon X5365 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $1,670 | |
| X5675 vs X5690 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $1,443 | |
| X5675 vs X5670 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $1,666 | |
| X5675 vs X5680 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $520 | |
| X5675 vs X5650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $240 | |
| X5675 vs 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $248 | |
| X5675 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,417 | $1,663 | |
| X5675 vs X5687 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
