CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5675 vs X5365 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon X5675 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5675  based on its performance, single-core performance, cost to run and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5675

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5675

Report a correction
Much better PassMark score 8,527 vs 3,491 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,405 vs 1,169 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better performance per watt 8.89 pt/W vs 1.22 pt/W More than 7.2x better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C vs 63 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 12 vs 4 Three times as many threads
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 121.88W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 3 GHz Almost the same
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.77 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 131.4 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 36.13 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Feb, 2011 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 6x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5675 vs X5365

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5675
25,323
Xeon X5365
10,747

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5675
2,418
Xeon X5365
1,565

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5675
1,650,000 MB/s
Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5675
13,025
Xeon X5365
4,944

GeekBench

Xeon X5675
13,025
Xeon X5365
4,944

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5675
8,527
Xeon X5365
3,491

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5675
1,405
Xeon X5365
1,169

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5675  vs
X5365 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 150W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 36.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 131.4 $/year
Performance per watt 8.89 pt/W 1.22 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 121.88W

details

Xeon X5675  vs
X5365 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 4
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 23 9
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 1 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 81.3°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.29 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.77 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz 3.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 1,333 MHz
Intel Xeon X5675
Report a correction
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus