0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5670 vs E7-4820 v2 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5670
- 2.93 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5670
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
VS
Released February, 2014
Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2
- 2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E7-4820 v2
![]() | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 16 MB |
![]() | More threads 16 | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 68 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 85.31W | Around 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 294,912 MB | Supports more than 5.2x more RAM | |||
Much more l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 12 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 3 years later |
Features Key features of the Xeon X5670 vs E7-4820 v2
clock speed
Xeon X5670
2.93 GHz
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2 GHz
turbo clock speed
Xeon X5670
3.33 GHz
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2.5 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon X5670
2 MB
Xeon E7-4820 v2
2 MB
L3 cache
Xeon X5670
12 MB
Xeon E7-4820 v2
16 MB
TDP
Xeon X5670
95W
Xeon E7-4820 v2
105W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5670 | vs | E7-4820 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 3 | |
Data rate | 51,200 MB/s | 86,400 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
details | Xeon X5670 | vs | E7-4820 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 4 | |
Clock multiplier | 22 | 20 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | Unknown - 68°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 42,666.64 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 1,572,864 MB |
Intel Xeon X5670 ![]() | Intel Xeon E7-4820 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $339 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs X3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $777 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs E5540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $350 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $240 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs Core i7 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,670 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs X5690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,417 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs X5675 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $520 | |
Intel Xeon X5670 vs X5650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||