CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5670 vs 2697 v2 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon X5670 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5670  based on its cost to run and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon X5670

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon X5670

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5670

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5670

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz vs 3.11 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 105.63W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.5 GHz vs 3.42 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 113.88 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 31.32 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 30 MB vs 12 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,685 vs 1,347 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 24 vs 12 Twice as many threads
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 294,912 MB Supports around 2.8x more RAM
Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 3 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5670 vs E5 2697 v2

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5670
24,364

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5670
1,590,000 MB/s
Xeon E5 2697 v2
2,320,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5670
13,847

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5670
14,780

GeekBench

Xeon X5670
14,780

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5670  vs
E5 2697 v2 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Hexa core Dodeca core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 2011

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 130W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 113.88 $/year
Performance per watt 8.54 pt/W 9.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 105.63W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 51,200 MB/s 64,000 MB/s
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 4,000 MHz

details

Xeon X5670  vs
E5 2697 v2 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 24
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L3 cache 12 MB 30 MB
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 22 27
Operating temperature Unknown - 81.3°C Unknown - 86°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.29 GHz 3.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.5 GHz 3.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz 3.11 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 31,999.98 MB/s 59,733.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 294,912 MB 786,432 MB
Intel Xeon X5670
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus