Intel Xeon X5670 vs E5-2670 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5670
- 2.93 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5670
 | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.29 GHz |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C | | Lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2670
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2670
| | Much more l3 cache 20 MB | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,590 |
| | More threads 16 | | Supports more RAM 393,216 MB |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon X5670CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.29 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 80 °C | Almost the same | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 93.44W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | vs | 3.08 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 12 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,590 | vs | 1,347 | Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
| Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 294,912 MB | Supports around 35% more RAM | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5670 vs E5-2670
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5670 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1366 | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.54 pt/W | 7.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 93.44W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 393,216 MB | |
details | Xeon X5670 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 22 | 33 | |
| Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | Unknown - 80°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 8 | 3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.29 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.29 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 51,200 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon X5670  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2670 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $339 | |
| X5670 vs X3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $777 | |
| X5670 vs E5540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $1,417 | |
| X5670 vs X5675 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $350 | |
| X5670 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $240 | |
| X5670 vs 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,443 | $1,670 | |
| X5670 vs X5690 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,594 | $350 | |
| E5-2670 vs 6700K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
