Winner
Intel Xeon X5670
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5670 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon X5670 vs E5-2450L |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.33 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 8.54 pt/W | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 20 MB | ![]() | More threads 16 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 56.88W | ![]() | Supports more RAM 393,216 MB |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 8.54 pt/W | vs | 3.29 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 12 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 77.19W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 294,912 MB | Supports around 35% more RAM | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later |
summary | Xeon X5670 | vs | E5-2450L |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 70W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 16.86 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 61.32 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.54 pt/W | 3.29 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 56.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
Data rate | 51,200 MB/s | 32,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon X5670 | vs | E5-2450L |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 38,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 393,216 MB |
Intel Xeon X5670 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2450L ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $339 | |
X5670 vs X3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $777 | |
X5670 vs E5540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $350 | |
X5670 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $240 | |
X5670 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,417 | |
X5670 vs X5675 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $520 | |
X5670 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,443 | $1,670 | |
X5670 vs X5690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||