Winner
Intel Core i5 3570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570 based on its single-core performance, power consumption and value.
See full details Intel Xeon X5660 vs Core i5 3570 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5660
- 2.8 GHz
- Hexa core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5660
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | More l3 cache 12 MB |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3570
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
7.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 3570
| | Much better performance per dollar 3.04 pt/$ | | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5660 vs 3570 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More l3 cache | 12 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 107.5W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More threads | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many threads | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 8.02 pt/W | vs | 4.22 pt/W | Around 90% better performance per watt | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 67 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Supports more RAM | 294,912 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 9x more RAM | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.73 GHz | vs | 4.22 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.04 pt/$ | vs | 0.58 pt/$ | Around 5.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,989 | vs | 1,279 | More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5660 vs Core i5 3570
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5660 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1366 | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 106 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.02 pt/W | 4.22 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 107.5W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Xeon X5660 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 21 | 34 | |
| Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.96 - 1.4V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 2 | 10 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.13 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.73 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.13 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon X5660  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3570 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $180 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $240 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs i7 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $160 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 4570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs i7 2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $184 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 3570K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $168 | $190 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
