0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5660 vs AMD Opteron 2376 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5660
- 2.8 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5660
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 12 MB |
![]() | Much better PassMark score 7,804 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2008
AMD Opteron 2376
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 2376
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 12 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better PassMark score | 7,804 | vs | 2,283 | Around 3.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.13 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per watt | 8.02 pt/W | vs | 1.24 pt/W | Around 6.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 55 °C | Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 4 | Three times as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.73 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Newer | Mar, 2010 | vs | Nov, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 77.19W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5660 vs Opteron 2376
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X5660
7,804
Opteron 2376
2,283
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5660 | vs | Opteron 2376 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 75W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.02 pt/W | 1.24 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 60.94W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Xeon X5660 | vs | Opteron 2376 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 21 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.13 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.73 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.13 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon X5660 ![]() | AMD Opteron 2376 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $248 | |
X5660 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $1,443 | |
X5660 vs X5670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $520 | |
X5660 vs X5650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $410 | |
X5660 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $1,417 | |
X5660 vs X5675 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $1,443 | |
X5660 vs X5570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,303 | $262 | |
X5660 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||