CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5650 vs E5-2650L among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon X5650
7.2
Xeon E5-2650L
6.2
Xeon X5670
7.4
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon X5650
8.0
Xeon E5-2650L
7.5
Xeon X5670
8.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon X5650
n.d.
Xeon E5-2650L
n.d.
Xeon X5670
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon X5650
0.0
Xeon E5-2650L
0.0
Xeon X5670
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon X5650
5.1
Xeon E5-2650L
5.1
Xeon X5670
5.1
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon X5650
n.d.
Xeon E5-2650L
n.d.
Xeon X5670
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Xeon X5650
5.0
Xeon E5-2650L
4.7
Xeon X5670
5.1

Winner
Intel Xeon X5650 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5650  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon X5650

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Xeon X5650
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5650

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5650

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 1.44 pt/$ vs 0.45 pt/$ Around 3.2x better performance per dollar
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C vs 72 °C Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2650L

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 20 MB vs 12 MB More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 16 vs 12 4 more threads
Lower typical power consumption 56.88W vs 77.19W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Supports more RAM 393,216 MB vs 294,912 MB Supports around 35% more RAM
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5650 vs E5-2650L

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5650
22,313
Xeon E5-2650L
5,131

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5650
2,176
Xeon E5-2650L
1,522

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5650
1,470,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2650L
1,030,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5650
13,247
Xeon E5-2650L
16,330

GeekBench

Xeon X5650
14,009
Xeon E5-2650L
16,330

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5650
7,510
Xeon E5-2650L
8,676

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5650
1,234
Xeon E5-2650L
1,117

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Xeon X5650  vs
E5-2650L 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.06 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 2011

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 95W 70W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 16.86 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 61.32 $/year
Performance per watt 7.89 pt/W 7.09 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 56.88W

bus
Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 51,200 MB/s 64,000 MB/s
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 4,000 MHz

details

 Xeon X5650  vs
E5-2650L 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 16
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 20 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 20 23
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 0.6 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 81.3°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 31,999.98 MB/s 51,200 MB/s
Maximum memory size 294,912 MB 393,216 MB
Intel Xeon X5650
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-2650L
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss