CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5650 vs E5-2640

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Cost to Run

Commercial Energy Cost

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Cost to Run and Value

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2640 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2640  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2640

Intel Xeon E5-2640

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5650

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5650

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 13.14 pt/$ vs 1.73 pt/$ More than 7.5x better performance per dollar
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 81.3 °C vs 73 °C More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2640

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2640

Report a correction
Slightly more l3 cache 15 MB vs 12 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Marginally newer Mar, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 9,708 vs 7,644 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,474 vs 1,229 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 15.81 pt/W vs 12.44 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Slightly better geekbench (32-bit) score 13,411 vs 12,501 More than 5% better geekbench (32-bit) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5650 vs E5-2640

GeekBench (32-bit)

Xeon X5650
12,501
Xeon E5-2640
13,411

GeekBench

Xeon X5650
14,205
Xeon E5-2640
13,411

Passmark (Single Core)

Xeon X5650
1,229
Xeon E5-2640
1,474

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5650  vs
E5-2640 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.06 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Hexa core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 2011
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 31,999.98 MB/s 42,666.64 MB/s
Maximum memory size 294,912 MB 393,216 MB

details

Xeon X5650  vs
E5-2640 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 12
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.33 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 15 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 20 30
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 0.6 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 81.3°C Unknown - 73°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 11 3

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 12.44 pt/W 15.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 77.19W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 51,200 MB/s 57,600 MB/s
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 7,200 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 3,600 MHz
Intel Xeon X5650
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus