0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5650 vs AMD Opteron 6366 HE |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon X5650
- 2.66 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5650
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 7.89 pt/W |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 81.3 °C | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.84 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2012
AMD Opteron 6366 HE
- 1.8 GHz
- 16 core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 6366 HE
![]() | Much more l2 cache 16 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 16 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | More threads 16 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5650 vs 6366 HE among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per watt | 7.89 pt/W | vs | 2.3 pt/W | Around 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 81.3 °C | vs | 65 °C | More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.84 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.64 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 16 MB | vs | 2 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 12 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.33 MB/core | More than 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 12 | 4 more threads | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 77.19W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Nov, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5650 vs Opteron 6366 HE
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X5650
7,510
Opteron 6366 HE
7,503
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X5650
1,234
Opteron 6366 HE
755
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5650 | vs | Opteron 6366 HE |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | 16 core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
G34 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.89 pt/W | 2.3 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 69.06W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Triple Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s |
details | Xeon X5650 | vs | Opteron 6366 HE |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 16 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 4 | |
Clock multiplier | 20 | 9 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 81.3°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 11 | 0 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.84 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.64 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.84 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon X5650 ![]() | AMD Opteron 6366 HE ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $264 | |
X5650 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $410 | |
X5650 vs E5-2620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $279 | |
X5650 vs E5620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,443 | |
X5650 vs X5570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $565 | |
X5650 vs E5645 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $1,670 | |
X5650 vs X5690 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||