CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5650 vs 8350

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD FX 8350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 8350

AMD FX 8350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5650

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5650

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 159.66W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache 12 MB vs 8 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 14,428 vs 12,105 Around 20% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better performance per watt 13.32 pt/W vs 5.31 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 159.62 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 3.06 GHz More than 35% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core More than 3x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better performance per dollar 4.84 pt/$ vs 1.26 pt/$ More than 3.8x better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.74 GHz vs 3.42 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,223 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 9,134 vs 7,661 Around 20% better PassMark score
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.98 GHz vs 4.05 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5650 vs FX 8350

GeekBench (32-bit)

Xeon X5650
13,725
FX 8350
11,100

GeekBench (64-bit)

Xeon X5650
14,428
FX 8350
12,105

GeekBench

Xeon X5650
14,428
FX 8350
12,796

Passmark

Xeon X5650
7,661
FX 8350
9,134
Xeon X5650 FX 8350 @ cpubenchmark.net
Looking at the physics score we can see a difference of just under 900 points with the AMD FX-8350 taking the lead with 7325 3DMarks.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Passmark (Single Core)

Xeon X5650
1,223
FX 8350
1,525
In Cinebench the AMD chip is only a little over 5 per cent slower, and in X264 there's less than a single per cent difference between them.
FX 8350 | by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5650  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.06 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
LGA 1366
AM3+
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
XOP
SSE3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 31,999.98 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Xeon X5650  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 8
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 2 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 11 709
Overclocked clock speed 3.42 GHz 4.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.05 GHz 4.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.42 GHz 4.74 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 13.32 pt/W 5.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 3,200 MHz 2,600 MHz
Intel Xeon X5650
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus