CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5570 vs E3113 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon X5570 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5570  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5570

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.58 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Newer Mar, 2009 vs Sep, 2008 Release date 6 months later
Front view of Intel Xeon E3113

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3113

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz Almost the same
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz vs 3.75 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5570 vs E3113

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5570
5,679
Xeon E3113
2,427

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5570
1,357
Xeon E3113
1,270

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5570  vs
E3113 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.61 pt/W 1.86 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

Xeon X5570  vs
E3113 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 0.95 - 1.21V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 3.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.58 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 3.93 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 2 1
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 1,333 MHz
Intel Xeon X5570
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3113
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus