Winner
Intel Pentium G4400
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G4400 based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details| | Intel Xeon X5570 vs Pentium G4400 |
| | More l3 cache 8 MB | | Significantly better performance per dollar 4.69 pt/$ |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | | More threads 8 |
by Tech Radar (Mar, 2009)In a preliminary run of SPEC CPU2006, arguably the most widely respected CPU performance benchmark in the world, the X5570 is capable of an estimated floating point base score of over 150.
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Newer Jul, 2015 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| | | Intel Pentium G4400CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 4.69 pt/$ | vs | 3.62 pt/$ | Around 30% better performance per dollar | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more threads | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 15,935 | vs | 6,950.5 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Mar, 2009 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 77.19W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,881 | vs | 1,357 | Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
summary | Xeon X5570 | vs | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 54W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.63 pt/W | 3.11 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon X5570 | vs | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 2 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.77 GHz | 3.92 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.58 GHz | 4.37 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.77 GHz | 3.92 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 31,999.98 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 147,456 MB | 65,536 MB | |
| Intel Xeon X5570 | Intel Pentium G4400 |
| VS | |
| 72 € | 120 € | |
| G4400 vs 6100 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | $42 | |
| G4400 vs G3900 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 68 € | |
| G4400 vs 7600 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 97 € | |
| G4400 vs G3258 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 72 € | |
| G4400 vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 60 € | |
| G4400 vs G3260 | ||
| VS | |
| 72 € | 93 € | |
| G4400 vs 3220 | ||
| VS | |
| 574 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
| VS | |
| 574 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | 999 € | |
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
| VS | |
| 574 € | ||
| 6200U vs 7200U | ||
| VS | |
| 369 € | 300 € | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| VS | |
| 300 € | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| VS | |
| 333 € | 548 € | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||