CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5470 vs 3770K


Benchmark performance using all cores


Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?



Performance Per Dollar

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5470

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 97.5W vs 114.98W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year vs 42.19 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score 6,731.8 vs 1,679.1 More than 4x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,639 vs 5,093 Around 90% better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,090 vs 1,448 Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 3.16 pt/$ vs 0.55 pt/$ Around 5.8x better performance per dollar
Marginally newer Apr, 2012 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 67.4 °C vs 63 °C More than 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.9 GHz vs 4.54 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5470 vs Core i7 3770K


Benchmark Results: The Intel Core i7-3770K finished in third place, which is where it has finished in most of the benchmarks with a solid score of 21293 3DMarks.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Passmark (Single Core)

Benchmark Results: The CPU benchmark results in 3DMark Vantage showed the Intel Core i7-3770K coming in third place again with a score of 26646 3DMarks.
Core i7 3770K | by Legit Reviews (Apr, 2012)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Xeon X5470  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Clock speed 3.33 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155
Is hyperthreaded No Yes


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes


Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9


Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1


Xeon X5470  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 22 nms
Transistor count 820,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 10 35
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 1.33 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 67.4°C


Overclocked clock speed 4.54 GHz 4.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.54 GHz 4.9 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,679.1 6,731.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.54 GHz 4.72 GHz

power consumption

TDP 120W 77W
Annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year 42.19 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year 112.39 $/year
Performance per watt 6.76 pt/W 8.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 97.5W 114.98W
Intel Xeon X5470
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770K
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus