CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5460 vs 750

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
Intel Xeon X5460 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon X5460  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon X5460

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon X5460

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5460

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 1 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3.16 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 97.5W vs 122.45W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark score 4,459 vs 3,329 Around 35% better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,349 vs 1,135 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year vs 42.81 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year vs 122.73 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 750

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 3.08 pt/$ vs 0.58 pt/$ More than 5.2x better performance per dollar
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 72.7 °C vs 63 °C More than 15% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Marginally newer Jul, 2009 vs Nov, 2007 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.14 GHz vs 3.88 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5460 vs Core i5 750

GeekBench (32-bit)

Xeon X5460
5,676
Core i5 750
5,664

GeekBench

Xeon X5460
5,676
Core i5 750
7,570

Passmark

Xeon X5460
4,459
Core i5 750
3,329
Results: Running Cinebench R10 in 64-bit mode showed that the Intel Core i7 870 and Core i5 750 processors were more than able to keep up with the other processors.
Core i5 750 | by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2009)

Passmark (Single Core)

Xeon X5460
1,349
Core i5 750
1,135

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5460  vs
Core i5 750 
Clock speed 3.16 GHz 2.66 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1156
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon X5460  vs
Core i5 750 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 45 nms
Transistor count 820,000,000 774,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 9 20
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 0.65 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 72.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.88 GHz 4.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.37 GHz 4.22 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.88 GHz 4.14 GHz

power consumption

TDP 120W 95W
Annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year 42.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year 122.73 $/year
Performance per watt 6.02 pt/W 3.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 97.5W 122.45W
Intel Xeon X5460
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus