0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5450 vs AMD Opteron 2384 |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon X5450
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5450
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.07 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2008
AMD Opteron 2384
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 2384
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year | ![]() | Newer Nov, 2008 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5450 vs 2384 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon X5450CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 2 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.07 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 97.5W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 105.12 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 28.91 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Nov, 2008 | vs | Nov, 2007 | Release date a year later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5450 vs Opteron 2384
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5450
7,850
Opteron 2384
8,798
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5450
1,580
Opteron 2384
1,334
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5450
127,150 MB/s
Opteron 2384
108,800 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X5450
4,167
Opteron 2384
3,538
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X5450
1,263
Opteron 2384
972
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5450 | vs | Opteron 2384 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 120W | 75W | |
Annual home energy cost | 28.91 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.46 pt/W | 2.12 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 97.5W | 60.94W |
details | Xeon X5450 | vs | Opteron 2384 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 13 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.07 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.07 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 2,200 MHz |
Intel Xeon X5450 ![]() | AMD Opteron 2384 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $969 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $339 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs Core2 Quad Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $1,245 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs X5460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | ||
Intel Xeon X5450 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $330 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs Core i7 2600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $287 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $205 | |
Intel Xeon X5450 vs Core i5 2400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||