0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X5365 vs X5355 |
Released August, 2007
Intel Xeon X5365
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X5365
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz | ![]() | Newer Aug, 2007 |
VS
Released November, 2006
Intel Xeon X5355
- 2.66 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the X5355
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 97.5W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs X5355 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon X5365CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.24 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Aug, 2007 | vs | Nov, 2006 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 97.5W | vs | 121.88W | 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | vs | 131.4 $/year | 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 28.91 $/year | vs | 36.13 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs X5355
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5365
10,747
Xeon X5355
9,667
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5365
1,565
Xeon X5355
1,408
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Xeon X5355
108,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X5365
4,944
Xeon X5355
4,430
GeekBench
Xeon X5365
4,944
Xeon X5355
4,430
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X5365
3,491
Xeon X5355
3,266
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X5365
1,169
Xeon X5355
1,045
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X5365 | vs | X5355 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 150W | 120W | |
Annual home energy cost | 36.13 $/year | 28.91 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 131.4 $/year | 105.12 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.22 pt/W | 1.37 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 121.88W | 97.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon X5365 | vs | X5355 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.5V | 1 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.24 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.4 GHz | 3.24 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon X5365 ![]() | Intel Xeon X5355 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$155 | $748 | |
Intel Core i7 860 vs Xeon X5355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$748 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon X5355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $748 | |
Intel Xeon 5160 vs X5355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $748 | |
Intel Core i5 2400 vs Xeon X5355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $1,164 | |
Intel Core i7 3770K vs Xeon X5365 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,245 | $1,164 | |
Intel Xeon X5460 vs X5365 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $1,164 | |
Intel Xeon 5160 vs X5365 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||