CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs 5160 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Aug, 2007 vs Jun, 2006 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon 5160

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5160

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 65W vs 121.88W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.63 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 131.4 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 36.13 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs 5160

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
10,747
Xeon 5160
5,525

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
1,565
Xeon 5160
1,569

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Xeon 5160
120,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
4,944
Xeon 5160
2,576

GeekBench

Xeon X5365
4,944
Xeon 5160
3,222

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5365
3,491
Xeon 5160
1,971

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5365
1,169
Xeon 5160
1,130

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5365  vs
5160 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 150W 80W
Annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year 19.27 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 131.4 $/year 70.08 $/year
Performance per watt 1.22 pt/W 1.56 pt/W
Typical power consumption 121.88W 65W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon X5365  vs
5160 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 9 9
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz 3.63 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 5160
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus