CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs 6700K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 6700K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 6700K  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700K

Intel Core i7 6700K

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 7 years later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 2,349 vs 1,169 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 73.94W vs 121.88W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.45 pt/W vs 1.22 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 17,583 vs 10,747 Around 65% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.64 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better performance per dollar 1.08 pt/$ vs 0.95 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 21.92 $/year vs 36.13 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 79.72 $/year vs 131.4 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.76 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs Core i7 6700K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
10,747
Core i7 6700K
17,583

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Core i7 6700K
6,010 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
4,944
Core i7 6700K
17,169

GeekBench

Xeon X5365
4,944
Core i7 6700K
17,169

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5365
3,491
Core i7 6700K
11,109

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Clock speed 3 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 150W 91W
Annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year 21.92 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 131.4 $/year 79.72 $/year
Performance per watt 1.22 pt/W 3.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 121.88W 73.94W

details

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 64°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.4 GHz 4.64 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 4.76 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz 4.64 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 0
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 6700K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus