CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs 3770K among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year vs 42.19 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 2.21 pt/$ vs 0.16 pt/$ Around 14.2x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,084 vs 1,169 Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,544 vs 3,491 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better performance per watt 4.55 pt/W vs 1.22 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 114.97W vs 121.88W More than 5% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.8 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.4 °C vs 63 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year vs 131.4 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs Core i7 3770K

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
10,747
Core i7 3770K
13,098

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Core i7 3770K
2,620,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
4,944
Core i7 3770K
13,703

GeekBench

Xeon X5365
4,944
Core i7 3770K
17,972

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 150W 77W
Annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year 42.19 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 131.4 $/year 112.39 $/year
Performance per watt 1.22 pt/W 4.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 121.88W 114.97W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 9 35
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1.33 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.4 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 4.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz 4.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus