CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs 3615QM among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3615QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3615QM  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz vs 3.03 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i7 3615QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3615QM

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 121.88W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 1.28 pt/$ vs 0.16 pt/$ Around 8.2x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 10.74 pt/W vs 1.22 pt/W More than 8.8x better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 63 °C More than 65% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark score 7,383 vs 3,491 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,644 vs 1,169 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 36.13 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 131.4 $/year 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs Core i7 3615QM

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
10,747

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Core i7 3615QM
2,220,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
4,944

GeekBench

Xeon X5365
4,944

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 3615QM 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
BGA 1224

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 150W 45W
Annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 131.4 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 1.22 pt/W 10.74 pt/W
Typical power consumption 121.88W 36.56W

details

Xeon X5365  vs
Core i7 3615QM 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 9 23
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz 3.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,344.5

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3615QM
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus