CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5365 vs G550 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron G550 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron G550  based on its single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron G550

Intel Celeron G550

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5365

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz vs 2.75 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron G550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G550

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 128,850 MB/s vs 121,300 MB/s More than 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 121.88W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Aug, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.66 pt/$ vs 0.95 pt/$ More than 75% better performance per dollar
Higher Maximum operating temperature 69.1 °C vs 63 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 36.13 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 131.4 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 2.11 pt/W vs 1.22 pt/W Around 75% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5365 vs Celeron G550

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
10,747
Celeron G550
3,240

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
1,565
Celeron G550
1,784

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
121,300 MB/s
Celeron G550
128,850 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5365
4,944
Celeron G550
3,133

GeekBench

Xeon X5365
4,944
Celeron G550
5,564

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5365
3,491
Celeron G550
2,299

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5365
1,169
Celeron G550
1,331

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5365  vs
Celeron G550 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 150W 65W
Annual home energy cost 36.13 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 131.4 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.22 pt/W 2.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 121.88W 52.81W

details

Xeon X5365  vs
Celeron G550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 9 26
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 69.1°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.4 GHz 2.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon X5365
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus