CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5355 vs L5335 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon L5335

Intel Xeon L5335

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5355

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5355

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Xeon L5335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L5335

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 40.63W vs 97.5W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 43.8 $/year vs 105.12 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.04 $/year vs 28.91 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Aug, 2007 vs Nov, 2006 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5355 vs L5335

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5355
9,667
Xeon L5335
7,112

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5355
1,408
Xeon L5335
1,088

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5355
108,000 MB/s
Xeon L5335
81,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5355
3,266
Xeon L5335
2,756

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5355  vs
L5335 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 120W 50W
Annual home energy cost 28.91 $/year 12.04 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 105.12 $/year 43.8 $/year
Performance per watt 1.37 pt/W 2.52 pt/W
Typical power consumption 97.5W 40.63W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon X5355  vs
L5335 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 582,000,000
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 8 6
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1.1 - 1.25V
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 60°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.24 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon X5355
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L5335
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus