CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X5270 vs 3570 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3570 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X5270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5270

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 65W vs 107.5W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.67 GHz vs 4.02 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 38.81 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 106 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.93 GHz vs 4.22 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 3.04 pt/$ vs 0.09 pt/$ More than 32.8x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better PassMark score 6,994 vs 2,524 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,989 vs 1,375 Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better performance per watt 4.22 pt/W vs 1.36 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67 °C vs 61 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X5270 vs Core i5 3570

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5270
4,151
Core i5 3570
9,904

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5270
2,233
Core i5 3570
3,072

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X5270
179.2 MB/s
Core i5 3570
2,580,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X5270
2,524
Core i5 3570
6,994

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X5270
1,375
Core i5 3570
1,989

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X5270  vs
Core i5 3570 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 77W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 106 $/year
Performance per watt 1.36 pt/W 4.22 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 107.5W

details

Xeon X5270  vs
Core i5 3570 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 10 34
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 0.96 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 61°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.67 GHz 4.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.93 GHz 4.22 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.67 GHz 4.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon X5270
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus