CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3470 vs 760 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon X3470

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon X3470

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3470

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 114.5W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.33 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Better PassMark score 5,195 vs 3,903 Around 35% better PassMark score
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 115.63 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 760

Report a correction
Significantly better performance per dollar 0.74 pt/$ vs 0.4 pt/$ More than 85% better performance per dollar
Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,089 vs 1,812 More than 15% better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Sep, 2009 Release date 9 months later
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.13 GHz vs 3.96 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3470 vs Core i5 760

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3470
6,645
Core i5 760
6,297

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3470
1,812
Core i5 760
2,089

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3470
108 MB/s
Core i5 760
132,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3470
5,195
Core i5 760
3,903

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X3470
1,233
Core i5 760
1,196

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3470  vs
Core i5 760 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.33 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1156

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 2,500 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Xeon X3470  vs
Core i5 760 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 774,000,000 774,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 21
Voltage range 0.65 - 1.4V 0.65 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.7°C Unknown - 72.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.96 GHz 4.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.39 GHz 4.49 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,225.7 1,682.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.96 GHz 4.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 39.42 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 115.63 $/year
Performance per watt 1.43 pt/W 1.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 114.5W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Xeon X3470
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 760
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus