Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3470

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 5,195 vs 965 Around 5.5x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,233 vs 689 Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of Intel Core Solo T1500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1500

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3470 vs Core Solo T1500

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3470  vs
Core Solo T1500 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1156
M
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon X3470  vs
Core Solo T1500 
Threads 8 1
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 77.19W N/A
Intel Xeon X3470
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo T1500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus