Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3450

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.08 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom C2750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2750

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better performance per watt 11.79 pt/W vs 1.79 pt/W More than 6.5x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 1.38 pt/$ vs 0.65 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 97 °C vs 72.7 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W vs 77.19W 4.8x lower typical power consumption
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 4.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 4.8x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 3 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3450 vs Atom C2750

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3450
6,945
Atom C2750
6,808

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3450
1,782
Atom C2750
1,089

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon X3450
107,000 MB/s
Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3450
4,912
Atom C2750
3,344

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3450  vs
Atom C2750 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 95W 20W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 1.79 pt/W 11.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 16.25W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon X3450  vs
Atom C2750 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.7°C Unknown - 97°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.08 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.08 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Xeon X3450
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus