CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3363 vs L3360 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon L3360 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon L3360  based on its single-core performance and cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon L3360

Intel Xeon L3360

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon X3363

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X3363

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.84 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.12 GHz vs 2.83 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Xeon L3360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon L3360

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 65W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Feb, 2009 vs Mar, 2008 Release date 11 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3363 vs L3360

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon X3363
4,042
Xeon L3360
3,820

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon X3363
1,213
Xeon L3360
1,221

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon X3363  vs
L3360 
Clock speed 2.83 GHz 2.83 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 65W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.43 pt/W 2.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 52.81W

details

Xeon X3363  vs
L3360 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.84 GHz 2.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.12 GHz 2.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.84 GHz 2.83 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 1,333 MHz
Intel Xeon X3363
Report a correction
Intel Xeon L3360
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus