0 Comments
| Intel Xeon X3360 vs Core2 Quad Q9550 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Xeon X3360
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X3360
![]() | Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 122,200 MB/s |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q9550
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.03 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of X3360 vs Q9550 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon X3360CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 122,200 MB/s | vs | 121,500 MB/s | Almost the same | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X3360 vs Core2 Quad Q9550
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3360
5,513
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,498
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3360
1,589
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,604
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3360
122,200 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q9550
121,500 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon X3360
5,028
Core2 Quad Q9550
5,132
GeekBench
Xeon X3360
5,157
Core2 Quad Q9550
7,065
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon X3360
4,024
Core2 Quad Q9550
4,002
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon X3360
1,202
Core2 Quad Q9550
1,199
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon X3360 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9550 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.83 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.65 pt/W | 1.51 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon X3360 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9550 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 820,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71.4°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.97 GHz | 3.99 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.83 GHz | 4.03 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | 3.99 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon X3360 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $287 | |
Q9650 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $287 | |
3220 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $287 | |
E8400 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$220 | $287 | |
2500K vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$183 | $287 | |
Q9500 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $287 | |
Q9400 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||